We often hear such a statement
Postado em 29/4/2009 em 05:14 AM
We often hear such a statement, the Golden Lotus is a part of " naturalism " Works. But, what " naturalism " on earth the Golden Lotus is France, I'm afraid that dim if I person am in the majority. I am cap of the western literature term of very repugnant this one, one set of absurd methods on the head in Chinese classic by force. For example " the Book of Songs is " yes " Realism " ,and "Lament " "romanticism " ; Du Fu is " Realism " ,Li it is in Bai " romanticism " ; " Dream of the Red Chamber is " " The artistic peak that realism combines with romanticism " . This kind is sorted out stiffly, is just doted on by our literary criticism.
According to " naturalism " Classical definition, i.e.: Require the direct impression of simple record of literature, require the writer is as calm, objective as natural scientist, not taking the emotional colouring, things and people written wrong carry on the society and ethical appraisal. Any piece have writing people of experience know naturalism it is very difficult for theory to carry out, get, create practice go totally. As the person who creates the subject, its subjective color does not want to permeate through the works, want to leave the earth pulling out one's own hair thoroughly.
Moreover, production and development of the Chinese novel, make it have such characteristics: First, the novel, especially the vernacular novel, often bearing " enlighten by education " Responsibility,actual effect that even if works produce the proper contrary to it. The festivals of loyalty and filial of the Confucianists justice, the Buddhist's karma, permeate through classical novel deeply. Second, the novel is in China, is originally nine the end of flowing, the thing that é? lane spreads, even author's localization to one's own works is the same. The novel that even if it is most serious to determine a topic, have amusement properties, game color all the time. The works with so great Dream of the Red Chamber are no exception. These single two points, determine, can not almost produce " naturalism " in classical novel Works.
" the Golden Lotus " it " Naturalism " ,To be frank, just make forbidden word of people's undisguised sex description very difficult to accept call to it. Chinese sexual standards are that " ugly that said, it is wonderful to do " (Lu XianShi) ,Unless the Golden Lotus not only there is tired treatise say wooden tablet or slip for writing, but also the so candid that we are surprising,commentator have to ambiguous talk, its defect lies in " Naturalism " . But as far as description of sex are concerned only, it is absolutely not " naturalism " . The life that it describes, originally there must be reality. But reader know sex description of it, bring typical man nature illusion composition to no small extent. For example the sex ability that the west door celebrates, no one will think it was " naturalism " . The author, to its beautification, even a kind of male genital has mark of offering as a gift worshipped. Someone point out 27 appear " whether red emperor hold power, shine too timid " Have one symbol color, the Golden Lotus come, do structural frame with male strength extinction behind being golden.
When Xia ZhiQing comments the Golden Lotus in " China's classical novel ", give one example, to Pan JinLian's health while telling a story, two describe obvious nonconformity. He thinks, this detail is unfounded, makes people " lose confidence " to the description of the Golden Lotus . He even says the Golden Lotus is in the novel that he discusses up until now " The most disappointing department " . I do not know why he is especially interested in this detail, I can only say, this kind of description when one is in high spirits, seen everywhere in classical novel, let alone a kind of failure, it is non- enough to judge the relative superiority of a work. As " Dou E wrong " have a match Lu medicine spoken parts of a Chinese opera made laughs to appear on the scene never can damage it as the first outstanding tragic status just.
The orthodox literature history, while praising a work, often by " expose dark reality deeply " As the standard that is judged. " the Golden Lotus " is praised, the reason is here. Expose dark reality while being what is called, basically each of novel works involves more or less. The works of the end that even third-class, do not lack vivid and vivid description. This is not only because actually that was life that the novel author can't avoid, and our culture to sincerely believe in two yuan and exist side by side, male genital and overcast, black and white, loyal and raping and seducing, chastity and excessive Struggle of two yuan is the strength of promoting the plot of a lot of novels at all. The Golden Lotus is here " Expose dark reality " Have, it is too many not to exceed other works. Unlike this, its tone is nearly totally dark, the bright tail is very thin.
In fact, should talk about " naturalism " ,The Scholars is close than it " Naturalism " . The Scholars does not have a distinct black-and-white contrast, but the dust of the depth, (orthodox literature history appreciate Fan set out crazy supervising two finger,etc. dramatic thing that growing severely always, Fan enter for after the officer in fact, grow, capture conspiratorially some such as the family property are much sharper and deeper with tight tribute) Though it has mixed many plays pen, it has written the boring existence state to the limit vulgarly. The awake garden is returned persons and said: "It is been the careful discuss " The Scholars ",whose name is to feel life experience have between the social intercourses in that read but not " The Scholars ". " Too, I thought The Scholars was a work that furthermore made persons being constrained more than the Golden Lotus.
According to " naturalism " Classical definition, i.e.: Require the direct impression of simple record of literature, require the writer is as calm, objective as natural scientist, not taking the emotional colouring, things and people written wrong carry on the society and ethical appraisal. Any piece have writing people of experience know naturalism it is very difficult for theory to carry out, get, create practice go totally. As the person who creates the subject, its subjective color does not want to permeate through the works, want to leave the earth pulling out one's own hair thoroughly.
Moreover, production and development of the Chinese novel, make it have such characteristics: First, the novel, especially the vernacular novel, often bearing " enlighten by education " Responsibility,actual effect that even if works produce the proper contrary to it. The festivals of loyalty and filial of the Confucianists justice, the Buddhist's karma, permeate through classical novel deeply. Second, the novel is in China, is originally nine the end of flowing, the thing that é? lane spreads, even author's localization to one's own works is the same. The novel that even if it is most serious to determine a topic, have amusement properties, game color all the time. The works with so great Dream of the Red Chamber are no exception. These single two points, determine, can not almost produce " naturalism " in classical novel Works.
" the Golden Lotus " it " Naturalism " ,To be frank, just make forbidden word of people's undisguised sex description very difficult to accept call to it. Chinese sexual standards are that " ugly that said, it is wonderful to do " (Lu XianShi) ,Unless the Golden Lotus not only there is tired treatise say wooden tablet or slip for writing, but also the so candid that we are surprising,commentator have to ambiguous talk, its defect lies in " Naturalism " . But as far as description of sex are concerned only, it is absolutely not " naturalism " . The life that it describes, originally there must be reality. But reader know sex description of it, bring typical man nature illusion composition to no small extent. For example the sex ability that the west door celebrates, no one will think it was " naturalism " . The author, to its beautification, even a kind of male genital has mark of offering as a gift worshipped. Someone point out 27 appear " whether red emperor hold power, shine too timid " Have one symbol color, the Golden Lotus come, do structural frame with male strength extinction behind being golden.
When Xia ZhiQing comments the Golden Lotus in " China's classical novel ", give one example, to Pan JinLian's health while telling a story, two describe obvious nonconformity. He thinks, this detail is unfounded, makes people " lose confidence " to the description of the Golden Lotus . He even says the Golden Lotus is in the novel that he discusses up until now " The most disappointing department " . I do not know why he is especially interested in this detail, I can only say, this kind of description when one is in high spirits, seen everywhere in classical novel, let alone a kind of failure, it is non- enough to judge the relative superiority of a work. As " Dou E wrong " have a match Lu medicine spoken parts of a Chinese opera made laughs to appear on the scene never can damage it as the first outstanding tragic status just.
The orthodox literature history, while praising a work, often by " expose dark reality deeply " As the standard that is judged. " the Golden Lotus " is praised, the reason is here. Expose dark reality while being what is called, basically each of novel works involves more or less. The works of the end that even third-class, do not lack vivid and vivid description. This is not only because actually that was life that the novel author can't avoid, and our culture to sincerely believe in two yuan and exist side by side, male genital and overcast, black and white, loyal and raping and seducing, chastity and excessive Struggle of two yuan is the strength of promoting the plot of a lot of novels at all. The Golden Lotus is here " Expose dark reality " Have, it is too many not to exceed other works. Unlike this, its tone is nearly totally dark, the bright tail is very thin.
In fact, should talk about " naturalism " ,The Scholars is close than it " Naturalism " . The Scholars does not have a distinct black-and-white contrast, but the dust of the depth, (orthodox literature history appreciate Fan set out crazy supervising two finger,etc. dramatic thing that growing severely always, Fan enter for after the officer in fact, grow, capture conspiratorially some such as the family property are much sharper and deeper with tight tribute) Though it has mixed many plays pen, it has written the boring existence state to the limit vulgarly. The awake garden is returned persons and said: "It is been the careful discuss " The Scholars ",whose name is to feel life experience have between the social intercourses in that read but not " The Scholars ". " Too, I thought The Scholars was a work that furthermore made persons being constrained more than the Golden Lotus.
0 comentários ::
link
